By Nana Nsiah Foster
The fatal collapse of a three-storey building in Accra New Town, which claimed at least two lives, is now at the center of growing scrutiny over Ghana’s building safety enforcement regime, as residents, engineers, and policy experts point to systemic failures that may have made the disaster entirely preventable.
For many in the densely populated suburb of Accra, the tragedy was not a surprise—but an inevitability long feared and widely discussed.
“I have been living in here for over 20 years now, and this building we are seeing very, very weak. Everybody in the community knows that this building is very, very weak, and then they’ll be allowing services and activities inside there, which is very bad,” a longtime resident told reporters.
His testimony reflects a troubling reality: warnings from within the community appear to have gone unheeded, raising critical questions about oversight, accountability, and regulatory enforcement.
A Collapse Foretold
The building, located in the busy Accra New Town enclave, reportedly housed both residential and commercial activities—an increasingly common practice in urban Ghana, where pressure on space drives multi-purpose occupancy, often without strict adherence to safety codes.
While authorities have yet to officially determine the cause of the collapse, structural weaknesses had been visible for years, according to multiple residents. Cracks in walls, sagging beams, and poor maintenance were reportedly evident, yet operations continued unabated.
Urban planners warn that such conditions are symptomatic of a broader crisis.
The Ghana Institution of Engineering (GhIE) has consistently raised concerns about the proliferation of substandard construction, particularly in informal and peri-urban settlements. Engineers affiliated with the institution have previously emphasized that weak enforcement—not lack of regulations—is the core issue.
Regulatory Gaps and Enforcement Failures
Ghana’s building sector is governed by established codes, including provisions under the National Building Regulations (L.I. 1630), which set standards for design, construction, and occupancy. However, enforcement remains inconsistent.
The Accra Metropolitan Assembly (AMA), responsible for permitting and inspections in the capital, has in past public statements acknowledged challenges such as limited personnel, inadequate logistics, and widespread non-compliance by developers.
Urban development analysts argue that buildings often escape inspection after initial approval—or are constructed without permits altogether.
The Ministry of Works and Housing has also recognized the risks posed by unauthorized structures. In policy discussions and national housing forums, officials have pointed to the need for stricter monitoring and penalties for non-compliance.
Yet, enforcement remains reactive rather than preventive—typically intensifying only after disasters occur.
Expert Warnings on Structural Integrity
Structural engineers stress that visible deterioration—like that described by residents—is often a late-stage indicator of deeper foundational issues.
The Ghana Institution of Surveyors has previously highlighted that many collapses stem from a combination of poor materials, unqualified workmanship, and structural overloading—especially when buildings designed for residential use are converted into commercial spaces.
International bodies such as the International Federation of Consulting Engineers emphasize that regular structural audits are essential, particularly for aging buildings or those subjected to increased usage.
In Ghana, however, such audits are rarely mandatory unless triggered by visible danger or legal disputes.
Emergency Response and Immediate Aftermath
Following the collapse, emergency responders, including personnel from the National Disaster Management Organisation (NADMO), were deployed to the site for rescue and recovery operations.
Authorities confirmed at least two fatalities, with fears that more individuals could have been trapped beneath the rubble in the immediate aftermath.
NADMO has, in previous incidents, reiterated the importance of public vigilance—encouraging residents to report structurally compromised buildings before disaster strikes.
However, the Accra New Town case suggests that community awareness alone is insufficient without institutional action.
A Pattern of Recurring Disasters
The Accra New Town collapse is not an isolated incident.
Ghana has witnessed multiple building collapses over the past decade, including high-profile cases in Kumasi and other parts of Accra. These incidents often reveal similar underlying causes: weak enforcement, unauthorized modifications, and disregard for engineering standards.
Reports by the Ghana Statistical Service indicate rapid urbanization, with Accra’s population growth placing enormous pressure on housing infrastructure. This has led to the expansion of informal settlements and the rise of unregulated construction practices.
Urban policy experts warn that without systemic reform, such tragedies will continue.
The Human Cost of Negligence
Beyond statistics and policy debates lies the human toll—families shattered, livelihoods destroyed, and communities traumatized.
Residents of Accra New Town describe a sense of collective grief mixed with frustration. For them, the collapse represents not just a tragic accident, but a failure of governance.
Local business owners operating near the collapsed structure say they had long feared for their safety but lacked the authority to compel action.
“People talked about it all the time,” one shopkeeper reportedly said in local media coverage. “But nothing was done.”
Calls for Accountability
Civil society organizations and built-environment professionals are now calling for a full investigation—not only into the immediate cause of the collapse, but also into potential lapses by regulatory bodies.
The Ghana Real Estate Developers Association (GREDA) has previously advocated for stronger collaboration between developers, regulators, and local authorities to ensure compliance with building standards.
Legal experts note that Ghana’s regulatory framework allows for sanctions against developers and property owners who violate safety codes. However, enforcement actions are often limited or delayed.
Accountability, they argue, must extend beyond individual property owners to include institutions responsible for oversight.
Policy Reform and the Way Forward
In response to recurring building collapses, policymakers have proposed reforms aimed at strengthening Ghana’s construction sector.
These include:
Digitization of building permit systems to improve transparency
Mandatory periodic structural assessments for multi-storey buildings
Increased funding and staffing for inspection units
Public education campaigns on building safety
The Parliament of Ghana has, in past sessions, debated measures to enhance urban planning enforcement, though implementation has been gradual.
Experts argue that political will—and not just policy design—will determine whether meaningful change occurs.
Community Voices: A Warning Ignored
The most striking aspect of the Accra New Town tragedy remains the clarity of the warning signs.
Residents knew the building was unsafe. They spoke about it. They feared it.
Yet, life went on—services continued, businesses operated, and authorities did not intervene decisively.
This disconnect between local knowledge and institutional response is perhaps the most critical lesson of the disaster.
—
Conclusion: Preventable Tragedy, Urgent Lessons
As investigations continue into the precise cause of the collapse, the broader narrative is already clear: this was not merely an accident, but a convergence of neglect, weak enforcement, and systemic gaps.
For Ghana, the incident underscores an urgent need to rethink how building safety is managed—moving from reactive responses to proactive prevention.
Until then, the words of the Accra New Town resident will continue to echo as both a warning and an indictment:
“Everybody in the community knows that this building is very, very weak.”
The question now is whether those responsible for enforcing safety knew—and if they did, why nothing was done.